<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Quirks of Penguicon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/1379/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/1379</link>
	<description>Jason Scott's Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:54:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Arnold</title>
		<link>http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/1379/comment-page-1#comment-5216</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 08:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ascii.textfiles.com/?p=1379#comment-5216</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;the immediate question is why the hell did you schedule 300 mish-mashed events instead of, say, 100 good ones? I still have that question.&lt;/i&gt;

This is a good question. It&#039;s because Penguicon, by its hybrid nature, attempts to be all things to all geeks. Our audience is so diverse in their interests, that most attendees are only interested in a fraction of our offerings. It will be a different fraction for each attendee. Most of them have never heard of half the guests of honor-- they tend to become fans of them because of going to Penguicon rather than vice-versa.

The reason we try to fill out almost a dozen stand-alone conventions under one roof, is that everyone can mix-and-match a very full weekend to their tastes. Best of all, they are likely to try a taste of an unfamiliar interest and see if they like it.

With only 100 events, we could make each of them rate a &quot;10&quot; from the point of view of a small constituency, but a &quot;10&quot; to a tech geek is a &quot;1&quot; to her significant other who came along for something else and has nothing to do that hour. Instead we fill it out so that most hours will have something worth doing for anybody.

Finally, it&#039;s because it&#039;s a participation-oriented event with a low barrier to entry.

We&#039;re still working out the bugs in the hybrid model. The approach presented here might be flawed. Some years we do it much better than others. None of this excuses what you went through, for which I apologize and take personal responsibility. But this is just providing a hopefully interesting answer to a worthy question.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>the immediate question is why the hell did you schedule 300 mish-mashed events instead of, say, 100 good ones? I still have that question.</i></p>
<p>This is a good question. It&#8217;s because Penguicon, by its hybrid nature, attempts to be all things to all geeks. Our audience is so diverse in their interests, that most attendees are only interested in a fraction of our offerings. It will be a different fraction for each attendee. Most of them have never heard of half the guests of honor&#8211; they tend to become fans of them because of going to Penguicon rather than vice-versa.</p>
<p>The reason we try to fill out almost a dozen stand-alone conventions under one roof, is that everyone can mix-and-match a very full weekend to their tastes. Best of all, they are likely to try a taste of an unfamiliar interest and see if they like it.</p>
<p>With only 100 events, we could make each of them rate a &#8220;10&#8243; from the point of view of a small constituency, but a &#8220;10&#8243; to a tech geek is a &#8220;1&#8243; to her significant other who came along for something else and has nothing to do that hour. Instead we fill it out so that most hours will have something worth doing for anybody.</p>
<p>Finally, it&#8217;s because it&#8217;s a participation-oriented event with a low barrier to entry.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re still working out the bugs in the hybrid model. The approach presented here might be flawed. Some years we do it much better than others. None of this excuses what you went through, for which I apologize and take personal responsibility. But this is just providing a hopefully interesting answer to a worthy question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Arnold</title>
		<link>http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/1379/comment-page-1#comment-5215</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 07:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ascii.textfiles.com/?p=1379#comment-5215</guid>
		<description>Mea culpa. It was exactly as you describe, and I watched that process in horror from the inside.

The short version of the story is that we had two Heads of Programming quit due to health reasons this year. It was a variety of sub-conventions on science fiction, gaming, tech, and so forth, each reasonably large if they had stood alone, with less than optimal coordination between them. Now that I&#039;m Convention Chair, I&#039;m setting the house in order for next year.

I totally understand about you not returning. It was great to hear your talk and get to speak with you briefly. I look forward to attending other conventions that feature you.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mea culpa. It was exactly as you describe, and I watched that process in horror from the inside.</p>
<p>The short version of the story is that we had two Heads of Programming quit due to health reasons this year. It was a variety of sub-conventions on science fiction, gaming, tech, and so forth, each reasonably large if they had stood alone, with less than optimal coordination between them. Now that I&#8217;m Convention Chair, I&#8217;m setting the house in order for next year.</p>
<p>I totally understand about you not returning. It was great to hear your talk and get to speak with you briefly. I look forward to attending other conventions that feature you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/1379/comment-page-1#comment-5214</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 03:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ascii.textfiles.com/?p=1379#comment-5214</guid>
		<description>I drooled over Penguicon&#039;s event list, but was too late to find a hotel room for less than the price of my plane ticket, and decided maybe next year. Now I dunno.

(What I saw of their room reservation system online was pretty screwed up, and the one person I got ahold of didn&#039;t seem interested in helping.)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I drooled over Penguicon&#8217;s event list, but was too late to find a hotel room for less than the price of my plane ticket, and decided maybe next year. Now I dunno.</p>
<p>(What I saw of their room reservation system online was pretty screwed up, and the one person I got ahold of didn&#8217;t seem interested in helping.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wintermute</title>
		<link>http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/1379/comment-page-1#comment-5213</link>
		<dc:creator>Wintermute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 17:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ascii.textfiles.com/?p=1379#comment-5213</guid>
		<description>As an attendee, it was obvious to me that the term &quot;clusterfuck&quot; best describes the level of organization for this year&#039;s Penguicon. One of the panels I attended had all panelists no-show. They others typically started late because one or more panelists didn&#039;t make it on time, and often times didn&#039;t belong on the panel to begin with.

That said, I did enjoy myself as an attendee. I attended two of your talks, the one on interactive fiction as well as the one on video games, and enjoyed them both.

&#039;mute

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an attendee, it was obvious to me that the term &#8220;clusterfuck&#8221; best describes the level of organization for this year&#8217;s Penguicon. One of the panels I attended had all panelists no-show. They others typically started late because one or more panelists didn&#8217;t make it on time, and often times didn&#8217;t belong on the panel to begin with.</p>
<p>That said, I did enjoy myself as an attendee. I attended two of your talks, the one on interactive fiction as well as the one on video games, and enjoyed them both.</p>
<p>&#8216;mute</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Krembs</title>
		<link>http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/1379/comment-page-1#comment-5212</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Krembs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 15:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ascii.textfiles.com/?p=1379#comment-5212</guid>
		<description>Hey Jason
You know who I am, so I all I have to say is that it&#039;s awesome to hear about other con and how they run them. And what the speaker adventure is like.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jason<br />
You know who I am, so I all I have to say is that it&#8217;s awesome to hear about other con and how they run them. And what the speaker adventure is like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
