<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Objects and People</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/1258/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/1258</link>
	<description>Jason Scott's Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:59:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/1258/comment-page-1#comment-4741</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 04:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ascii.textfiles.com/?p=1258#comment-4741</guid>
		<description>Cool post! I think this is why I find some of the archival work that Google does so fascinating. Looking at the &quot;Timeline View&quot; of my emails in Google Desktop or revisting decades old Usenet posts on Google Groups is still a pale imitation of the genuine article, but in many cases it can be a very cool cross-section of the day-to-day details, whether significant or mundane, that we all leave scattered behind us. (Example: &quot;i&#039;m at the computer lab right now - then i&#039;m going home to wait for my sister - we&#039;re going to get a key made for our backdoor, then we&#039;ll probably go to the unicorn or something.&quot;)

But it is a shame that this is ultimately a very limited view into the past, that leaves undocumented things like BBSes and probably millions of CD-Rs with obscure labels like &quot;New Site Assets, V36&quot; and so on. But then again... some things *are* better left unremembered =)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool post! I think this is why I find some of the archival work that Google does so fascinating. Looking at the &#8220;Timeline View&#8221; of my emails in Google Desktop or revisting decades old Usenet posts on Google Groups is still a pale imitation of the genuine article, but in many cases it can be a very cool cross-section of the day-to-day details, whether significant or mundane, that we all leave scattered behind us. (Example: &#8220;i&#8217;m at the computer lab right now &#8211; then i&#8217;m going home to wait for my sister &#8211; we&#8217;re going to get a key made for our backdoor, then we&#8217;ll probably go to the unicorn or something.&#8221;)</p>
<p>But it is a shame that this is ultimately a very limited view into the past, that leaves undocumented things like BBSes and probably millions of CD-Rs with obscure labels like &#8220;New Site Assets, V36&#8243; and so on. But then again&#8230; some things *are* better left unremembered =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
