<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: World Expert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/1060/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/1060</link>
	<description>Jason Scott&#039;s Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:22:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob "Flack" O'Hara</title>
		<link>http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/1060/comment-page-1#comment-4126</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob "Flack" O'Hara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 01:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ascii.textfiles.com/?p=1060#comment-4126</guid>
		<description>As you and I have discussed, all the complaints I&#039;ve received about Commodork fall under the umbrella of, &quot;you forgot to mention $X,&quot; which really is to say, &quot;you told YOUR story but you didn&#039;t tell MINE.&quot; I think it was you who said the positive feedback is nice but the negative ones are the ones you can really take something from. The e-mails I&#039;ve received from people are either generic (you didn&#039;t talk about telnet BBSes) or specific (you didn&#039;t talk about my favorite cracking group).

Some of the stuff I left out was stuff I simply didn&#039;t experience, but some was cut intentionally in order to help the flow of the story. That&#039;s something I don&#039;t think most people get; the BBS Documentary does not represent 100% of Jason Scott&#039;s knowledge about BBSes. When you research a project such as that, you amass an encyclopedia&#039;s worth of data; the job then becomes taking that much data and presenting it to viewers in some palatable fashion. It&#039;s the same with any movie that was first a book. You simply can&#039;t make a 12 hour film. (And no my friend, that is not a challenge ...)

When writing books (or producing films) about nostalgic subjects such as these, I&#039;ve learned that while some people read to discover what you have to say, they&#039;re also looking for their own past in your work. Without that the reader (or again, viewer) walks away with an empty feeling that you didn&#039;t tell their story.

It was a difficult mistake to learn, but one I am correcting with book number two.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you and I have discussed, all the complaints I&#8217;ve received about Commodork fall under the umbrella of, &#8220;you forgot to mention $X,&#8221; which really is to say, &#8220;you told YOUR story but you didn&#8217;t tell MINE.&#8221; I think it was you who said the positive feedback is nice but the negative ones are the ones you can really take something from. The e-mails I&#8217;ve received from people are either generic (you didn&#8217;t talk about telnet BBSes) or specific (you didn&#8217;t talk about my favorite cracking group).</p>
<p>Some of the stuff I left out was stuff I simply didn&#8217;t experience, but some was cut intentionally in order to help the flow of the story. That&#8217;s something I don&#8217;t think most people get; the BBS Documentary does not represent 100% of Jason Scott&#8217;s knowledge about BBSes. When you research a project such as that, you amass an encyclopedia&#8217;s worth of data; the job then becomes taking that much data and presenting it to viewers in some palatable fashion. It&#8217;s the same with any movie that was first a book. You simply can&#8217;t make a 12 hour film. (And no my friend, that is not a challenge &#8230;)</p>
<p>When writing books (or producing films) about nostalgic subjects such as these, I&#8217;ve learned that while some people read to discover what you have to say, they&#8217;re also looking for their own past in your work. Without that the reader (or again, viewer) walks away with an empty feeling that you didn&#8217;t tell their story.</p>
<p>It was a difficult mistake to learn, but one I am correcting with book number two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
