<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Printout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/1007/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/1007</link>
	<description>Jason Scott&#039;s Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:22:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Scott</title>
		<link>http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/1007/comment-page-1#comment-3674</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ascii.textfiles.com/?p=1007#comment-3674</guid>
		<description>Goodness, I&#039;m a little shocked you would think I&#039;d ever throw anything away, ever, under any circumstance.

My most recent effort has been to scan and OCR these papers. That only gathers a certain couple of vectors of information, that is, the arrangement and the content of the text. It leaves out a lot about the consistency of the paper, the feel of the dots, the heft of the pile. Not stuff that easily transfers now and not stuff that might hold interest to current generations, but later ones will likely have other ways of keeping this.

It may sound science fiction-y but there could very well be a way to produce holograms or cloned versions of historical stuff in the future. If this is the case, then you would definitely want the original items.

Either way, there is no benefit, after 20 years, of me intentionally trashing stuff just because my newest approach to transcribing it into another form is somewhat successful. Let life, disaster and entropy do that work.

I bag these printouts in archival plastic bags with acid-free backing and store them with indications of what they are. Always.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goodness, I&#8217;m a little shocked you would think I&#8217;d ever throw anything away, ever, under any circumstance.</p>
<p>My most recent effort has been to scan and OCR these papers. That only gathers a certain couple of vectors of information, that is, the arrangement and the content of the text. It leaves out a lot about the consistency of the paper, the feel of the dots, the heft of the pile. Not stuff that easily transfers now and not stuff that might hold interest to current generations, but later ones will likely have other ways of keeping this.</p>
<p>It may sound science fiction-y but there could very well be a way to produce holograms or cloned versions of historical stuff in the future. If this is the case, then you would definitely want the original items.</p>
<p>Either way, there is no benefit, after 20 years, of me intentionally trashing stuff just because my newest approach to transcribing it into another form is somewhat successful. Let life, disaster and entropy do that work.</p>
<p>I bag these printouts in archival plastic bags with acid-free backing and store them with indications of what they are. Always.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flack</title>
		<link>http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/1007/comment-page-1#comment-3673</link>
		<dc:creator>Flack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 23:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ascii.textfiles.com/?p=1007#comment-3673</guid>
		<description>Was the Epson FX-80 really popular or what? Count me as another former owner. And, no matter how loud you say it was, there&#039;s no way it could match the deafening clickety-clack of a daisy wheel printer. For a while we owned both, and let me tell you, if you think the FX-80 would wake your parents, a daisy wheel monstrosity could wake the dead.

My question for you Jason is, once you&#039;ve scanned in the papers, do you throw them away? I can&#039;t. Even after the papers have been scanned or the old disks have been converted, the memories, stories, and history still remain in the originals. I wish I could let them go, as it sure would be nice to park a vehicle in my garage, but to date I cannot.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was the Epson FX-80 really popular or what? Count me as another former owner. And, no matter how loud you say it was, there&#8217;s no way it could match the deafening clickety-clack of a daisy wheel printer. For a while we owned both, and let me tell you, if you think the FX-80 would wake your parents, a daisy wheel monstrosity could wake the dead.</p>
<p>My question for you Jason is, once you&#8217;ve scanned in the papers, do you throw them away? I can&#8217;t. Even after the papers have been scanned or the old disks have been converted, the memories, stories, and history still remain in the originals. I wish I could let them go, as it sure would be nice to park a vehicle in my garage, but to date I cannot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fuzz</title>
		<link>http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/1007/comment-page-1#comment-3672</link>
		<dc:creator>fuzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ascii.textfiles.com/?p=1007#comment-3672</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m even more impressed that not just do Epson have a manual up for your FX-80, but there&#039;s even a driver for it, all the way up to NT 4.0.  Now I wonder where my old dot matrix got to?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m even more impressed that not just do Epson have a manual up for your FX-80, but there&#8217;s even a driver for it, all the way up to NT 4.0.  Now I wonder where my old dot matrix got to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lazlo Nibble</title>
		<link>http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/1007/comment-page-1#comment-3671</link>
		<dc:creator>Lazlo Nibble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 01:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ascii.textfiles.com/?p=1007#comment-3671</guid>
		<description>Conincidence creep raises its ugly head again: my first printer was an FX-80 too.  I think it&#039;s still in my closet at home, covered in mouse pee (don&#039;t ask).  It was eventually replaced with a NEC PinWriter; its output quality was astounding (24 pins on the print head!) but the thing made the screechy FX-80 seem like &quot;Ambient 1: Music For Airports&quot;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conincidence creep raises its ugly head again: my first printer was an FX-80 too.  I think it&#8217;s still in my closet at home, covered in mouse pee (don&#8217;t ask).  It was eventually replaced with a NEC PinWriter; its output quality was astounding (24 pins on the print head!) but the thing made the screechy FX-80 seem like &#8220;Ambient 1: Music For Airports&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
